Edited and
translated by Nirajan Kafle and Rajan Khatiwoda
Created: 2024-09-10;
Last modified: 2024-12-06
For the metadata of the document, click here
[1r]
1नं१६६11"स्वस्तिश्रीगिरिराजचक्रचूडामणिनरनारायणेत्यादिविविधविरूदावलीविराज[1r]
No. 166
Hail! A letter (arjī) from Bālāśaṃkara with crores and crores of auspicious blessings from here to him who is shining with manifold rows of eulogy [such as] ‘The venerable crest-jewel of the multitude of mountain kings’ and Naranārāyaṇa (i.e. an epithet of Kṛṣṇa) etc., high in honour, the venerable supreme king of great kings, the fivefold venerable great king, Rājendra Vikrama Śāha, the brave swordsman, the divine king always triumphant in war.
I am well here; I wish [Your Majesty] well-being there. Further (uprānta): O Lord of the poor, my days are spent in suffering. I have not been favoured with any royal order (hukuma), parvānā or daskhat from -1- [Your Majesty, Śrī 5 Sarkāra]1 concerning my situation. [Your] devotee is helpless and distressed and worried. I have not received any response to the letters of various content I sent to the feet of -1- (i.e. Your Majesty).
My humble request is as follows: From the day that Bell Sāheba Bahādura (Bela Sāhāba) raided our house—from that day on, I had hoped for an order from the British government. After two months, Bell Sāheba Bahādura (Bela Sāhāba) gave me an order: "Do your tasks as usual," but he did not issue any [formal] documents or letters to me. Since receiving that order, I have sent two arjīs to the feet of -1- (i.e. Your Majesty). One was sent through the English postal service, and the other through a royal mail runner (hukumīkā sadake)—a total of 2—to the feet of -1- (i.e. Your Majesty). What is my fault or misfortune that my letter is not favoured with a response from -1- (i.e. Your Majesty)? In any case, it must be my own fault, for [your] devotee is [both] the guilty party and -1- [Your Majesty]'s servant. May my faults be forgiven. Whatever suitable orders you bestow upon me with your compassionate eyes, I will accordingly follow. God knows my current condition—whom else can I share my troubles with besides a lord like you? Regarding you as my supreme lord (parameśvara), I repeatedly pray to you.
You are my master and lord. After my arjī is reviewed, [your] devotee remains hopeful of orders. I will display proper servitude whatever form your orders take. I send arjīs by post; they do not reach your feet—I do not know why. I send someone; they do not return. [Your] devotee is become helpless and distressed and worried. Ever since things have not been going well here, no one is willing to make me any loans. My reputation has suffered, and for 10 months I have not been favoured with any money for expenses from -1- (i.e. Your Majesty). Due to the chaotic situation (i.e. by the house raid), I have had to draw heavily from my own funds. I may blame my destiny for causing this distress, but -1- [Your Majesty] is capable of rescuing me. There is nothing else to make matters worse. I have renounced everything (sāre jagata) and taken refuge at -1- [Your Majesty]’s lotus feet. What is needed is that -1- [Your Majesty]’s feet help me. [Your] devoteee is -1- (i.e. Your Majesty)’s loyal (namakahalāla) servant, and as long as I live I am ready to give my life for -1- [Your Majesty] (lit. for [Your Majesty’s] salt (namaka ūpara). Further details will be communicated through Havaldāra Nāyāyaṇa Thāpā. Additional information from the newspapers will be passed on to you for your consideration.
What more need I request of you? -1- (i.e. Your Majesty) is all-knowing (sarvajña). May my wrongdoings be forgiven, whether done knowingly or unknowingly.
On Monday, the 14th of the bright fortnight of Māgha in the Vikrama era [year] 1895 (1839 CE). From Delhi. Auspiciousness.
[This] arjī is from Bālāśaṃkara Brāhmaṇa.
Bālāsaṃkara is an early-19th-century figure of ambiguous stature in Nepal (see the Commentary in DNA_0002_0039). Officially he was a royal messenger stationed in Delhi, but his activities and identity remain uncertain. Although he communicated with the Nepalese royal court, he was not a formal envoy, a role held by others like Lokaramaṇa Upādhyāya (see Bajracharya, Cubelic, and Khatiwoda, VS 2072 and VS 2073).
The raid on his house adds to the mystery, the reasons behind it being unclear. His letters, of which 61 survive (see DNA_0002_0039), here show a man pleading for support, often using highly formal and deferential language. While focused on personal hardships, they lack explicit political or diplomatic content, suggesting possible hidden communications. The involvement of British officials like Bell Sāheba Bahādura, together with the raid, hint at deeper intrigue, reflecting Bālāsaṃkara's precarious position between Nepal and British India. His correspondence offers cryptic insights into Nepal's intelligence network and its tense relationship with British colonial power, leaving much about his role and motivations uncertain.