Edited and
translated by Nirajan Kafle and Rajan Khatiwoda
Created: 2025-07-03;
Last modified: 2025-12-12
For the metadata of the document, click here
[1r]
1हामीवाटमर्जी[1r]
Our (i.e. Prime Minister Vīra Śamśera’s) Order!
Approved on Thursday, the 2nd of the bright fortnight of Caitra in the [Vikrama Era] year [19]51 (i.e. 1895 CE).
Having been decided upon deliberation.
As suggested by Engineer Jogeṃdra Candra Aica, to bring water to Bhaktapur from Nagarkot, for the work of constructing a stream-source headworks (heḍavara) at Nagarkot, and to construct a reservoir at the place Bā̃saghārī (text: Vāsaghārī; refers to an area near Kharipati, where the Nepalese Military Academy is located today), a budget of up to moharu 30,000 shall be allocated.
Moharu 4,000 for the reservoir and moharu 2,000 for the stream-source headworks shall be provided as advance payment, and the responsibility for construction shall be handed over. If moharu 300 for the reservoir and moharu 200 for the headworks remain uncleared in the syāhā ledger, responsibility shall be transferred only after the balance has been settled.
Since the responsibility is to be given only in accordance with the sanad issued in the name of the Guṭhī Tahasīl Aḍḍā, and for the construction of the reservoir it is necessary to prepare and bake chhāpāvāla-bricks and sahalīyāṃ-bricks within the next two months, an advance of moharu 8,400 is to be provided—through ḌiṭhṭhāPṛthvī Bahādura—to the Avāles (brick-makers; Avāle being their family name) for the task of preparing the required bricks, since brickwork cannot be carried out during the rainy season.
However, as the work primarily involves lime mortar, the supply of lime alone is insufficient for completing the task. From the previously sanctioned amount of moharu 6,000, an advance was granted for the purchase of lime, and arrangements are being made accordingly. Since lime cannot be procured during the rainy season, it is necessary to purchase the required quantity of lime within the next two months so that the work may continue smoothly during that period.
At the present time, after arranging for the supply of lime and providing an additional advance of moharu 4,000—making a total of moharu 12,400—it has been decided that, in accordance with the prescribed procedures of the Ain and savālas, the responsibility for this work be assigned to SubedārŚaṅkara Sāhī (text: Saṃṣara Sāhī), and that an order (purjī) be issued in the name of the Guṭhī Tahasīl Office.
Thursday, the 2nd of the bright fortnight of Caitra, in the [Vikrama Era] year 1951 (1895 CE). Auspiciousness.
The document’s bureaucratic precision reflects the enduring legacy of a long water management tradition in the Kathmandu Valley. Archaeological and epigraphic evidence traces organized hydraulic systems to the Licchavi period (ca. 300–900 CE), when rulers established reservoirs (pukhu/pokharī) and channels (kulo) supplied by perennial springs (Spodek 2002: 66). Inscriptions from sites such as Hadigaon and Changu Narayan record endowments for the maintenance of hiti (stone spouts), administered through local trusts and supervised by royal officials (UN-Habitat 2008: 9–10). These early systems linked hydraulic engineering with religious notions of purity and puṇya (merit), framing waterworks as acts of devotion and civic virtue.
By the Malla period (thirteenth–eighteenth centuries), this synthesis of ritual and civic function became highly institutionalized. The three royal cities—Kathmandu, Patan, and Bhaktapur—developed extensive networks of canals (rāja-kulo), ponds, and stone spouts that supplied water to neighborhoods, temples, and resthouses. In Bhaktapur, guṭhī trusts managed these systems through funds for cleaning, repair, and ritual offerings (Gautam 2014: 19–28). Royal inscriptions prescribed penalties for neglect and aligned maintenance with ritual calendars such as Sithi Nakha (Tripathi 2016: 92–96).
The nineteenth-century sanada thus marks a transitional phase between Malla-era communal management and the bureaucratic rationalization of the Rana state. The Guṭhī Tahasīl Aḍḍā formalized older communal mechanisms within a centralized fiscal framework. In Bhaktapur, the Nagarkot–Bhaktapur project recorded in this document continued the hydraulic logic of earlier centuries—capturing upland springwater to replenish urban reservoirs and hitis through gravity channels (Gautam 2014: 21–26). The sanad’s focus on pre-monsoon construction and financial accountability reflects both empirical hydrological knowledge and emerging administrative discipline. Viewed in this longue durée, the order exemplifies a moment when ancient technologies of water management, refined through Licchavi and Malla ingenuity, were maintained through modern bureaucratic means.