Version with DOI and citation guidelines Editorial Principles

A written statement by Meheramāna Nhuche Pradhāna to the government withdrawing from the tender process for the gambling licence at the market square of Asan (VS 1959)

ID: K_0499_0047


Edited and translated by Simon Cubelic in collaboration with Rajan Khatiwoda
Created: 2016-09-27; Last modified: 2018-06-15
For the metadata of the document, click here

Published by Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities: Documents on the History of Religion and Law of Pre-modern Nepal, Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. With kind permission of the National Archives, Kathmandu. The copyright of the facsimile on which this edition is based remains with the National Archives, Kathmandu. All use of the digital facsimiles requires prior written permission by the copyright holder. See Terms of Use.
The accompanying edition, translation/synopsis and/or commentary are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License CCby-SA.

Abstract

In this written statement, Meheramāna Nhuche Pradhāna declares that he is not willing to bid more than 80 moru for the gambling license at the market square of Asan for the years VS 1959-1961, which is four moru less than his rival. Furthermore, he will not contest the result of the auction.



Diplomatic edition

[1r]

श्री­

1श्री­अंन्नपुर्णा­
2१­

1श्री­५­सर्कार­
2२­

1लीषीतम­•सहर­काठमाडौ­टुंवहाल­टोल्­वस्ने­वर्ष­४१­को­मेहेरमान्‌­न्हुछे­प्रधान्­आगे­•१­का­चार
2कील्ला­भीत्रको­दवुलीमा­सर्कारवाट­फुकाई­वक्सेका­जुवाका­वषत्­•पासो­थापी­वर्षको­मो­रु­
3८०­⟪का­दरले­⟫सम्म­यो­५९­सालदेषी­६१­सालतक्­•वुझाउला­भनी­•वढीवढाउ­गरी­कवुल­गरेकोमा­
4असन्­वस्ने­कुलरत्न­उदासले­मोह­रु­४­वढी­•ज्मा­मोह­रु­•८४­वुझाउला­भनी­कवुल­गरेपछी­
5येस्मा­वढी­कवुल­गर्छौ­की­•राजीनामा­लेषने­हो­साचो­भन­भनी­•आज­येस­अडावाट­म[?]
6ग­सोद्‌दा­•मेरो­चीत्त­वुझ्यो­•लेषीयाको­मो­रु­८०­देषी­•म­•वढी­कवुल­गर्न­सक्तीन­सो­नस
7क्नाले­मेरो­भंदा­वढी­मो­रु­४­वढी­कवुल­गर्ने­नीज­कुलरत्नलाई­दीनु­येस्मा­वढी
8वढाउ­गर्न­पाईन­भनी­•कौनै­कुरामा­उजुर­गर्ने­छैन­भनी­मेरा­मनोमान­षुसीराजी
9संग­•राजीनामाको­ज्मानवंदी­मुचुल्का­लेषी­गुठी­जाच­अडा­मार्फत्­¯ ¯ २¯­मा­चढा
10ञ्यूं­ईती­सम्वत्­१९५९­साल­आश्वीन­सुदी­१२­रोज­३­शुभम्­

सहि

Translation

[1r]

Śrī

Śrī Annapūrṇā 1

Śrī 5 Sarkāra 2

This has been written by [me,] Meheramāna Nhuche Pradhāna, aged 41 [and] living in Ṭuṃbahāla Ṭola, Kathmandu city. [Regarding] the following: I increased the bid and made a promise, stating: “I will organize gambling on the occasions permitted by Sarkāra at the market square [of Asan, which is] within the four boundaries of ---1--- (i.e. Guṭhi of Śrī Annapūrṇā) and will pay [for the contract] at a rate of 80 moru per annum from [19]59 to [19]61”. Whereupon Kularatna Udāsa, who is living at Asan, made a promise, stating: “I will pay 4 moharu more, [that is,] 84 moharu in total [per year]”. Today I was asked about this matter by this office (aḍḍā): “Say truly whether you’ll promise more on top of that or intend to write a letter of withdrawal”, I was content [to say]: “I cannot promise more than the 80 moru [already] written [by me]. Since I cannot [promise more than that], give [the contract] to Kularatna, who has promised 4 moru more than me”. I have willingly written [the present] statement of withdrawal (rājīnāmāko jamānabaṃdī muculkā), stating [additionally] that I will not complain in any matter to the effect that I did not have a chance to submit any higher bid, and may [now herewith] submit it to ---2--- (i.e. Śrī 5 Sarkāra) through Guṭhī Jā̃ca Aḍḍā. Tuesday, the 12th of the bright fortnight of Āśvina in the year 1959. [May there be] auspiciousness.

Signature.


Commentary

This document is the last one of a series of four documents in which the matter of concern is a recently concluded tender process for assigning the gambling license for the market square at Asan for the years VS 1959-1961 (cf. K_0499_041, K_0499_047, K_0499_048). K_0499_041 states that Meheramāna Nhuche Pradhāna at first won the tender. However, even though the official deadline had expired, a man by the name of Kularatna successfully filed a petition that led to a repetition of the process, but instead of a formal tender process the bidders were to be assembled for an auctioning off the licence. Eventually, Meheramāna dropped out of the competition. However, not all documents relating to this auction are extant. Only the bonds of Meheramāna are recorded.


Notes