Version with DOI and citation guidelines Editorial Principles

A copy of a letter from Kaparadāra Kālidāsa Khaḍkā re the worship of Śrī Bhagavatī at Palāñcoka (VS 1841)

ID: K_0579_0071


Edited and translated by Astrid Zotter in collaboration with Pabitra Bajracharya
Created: 2022-06-13; Last modified: 2023-01-10
For the metadata of the document, click here

Published by Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities: Documents on the History of Religion and Law of Pre-modern Nepal, Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. Published by the courtesy of the National Archives, Kathmandu. The copyright of the facsimile remains with the Nepal Rashtriya Abhilekhalaya (National Archives, Government of Nepal). All use of the digital facsimiles requires prior written permission by the copyright holder. See Terms of Use.
The accompanying edition, translation/synopsis and/or commentary are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License CCby-SA.

Abstract

In the document of which this is a copy, Kaparadāra Kālīdāsa Khaḍkā orders the division of a field at Palāñcoka's Rānīpokhari measuring 100 murīs. From one half, rice offered in daily worship to Śrī Bhagavatī of Palāñcoka is henceforth to be provided under the management of Bhagavanta Bāḍā. From the other half, sacrificial animals and other worship items needed during both Dasaĩ festivals are to be provided under the supervision of the members of a trust (guṭhi).



Diplomatic edition

[2r]

1सही­

1सकल्‌­वमोजिं­नकल्‌­दुरुस्त­छ­भनी­
2सहिछाप्‌­गर्न्या­करुणा­नंद­गोभाजु­[...]
3षं­वाहाल्‌­¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

1श्री­दुर्गासाहाय­

1श्री­वडा­महाराजा­
2१­

1श्री­भगवति­
2२­

1⟪१९­⟫

1स्वस्तिश्रीकपर्दार•कालिदासषड्‌का.कस्य­लिषापत्रम्‌­¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯
2आगे­पलांचोकको­रानिपोषरि­षेत­मुरी­सये­१००­¯ ¯१¯ले­¯ ¯२¯कन­नित्यपूजाको­अक्षेता­
3भनी­चर्‍हायाको­हो­दुई­तिन­वर्ष­अक्षेतै­गरि­चर्‍ह्योथ्यो­•पछि­सर्का•र­विन्ति­नगरीकन­गुठ­भ
4य़छ­•तस्कारण­मुष्य­सवै­षेत­अछेता­रहन्या­हो­परंतु­गुठ­पनि­चलाऊ­भंनाले­रानीपोष
6रिको­
सय­मुरि­षेतमध्ये­मुरि­पचास­षेत­⟪स्ही⟫⟪[?]णा ⟫अछेताकन­र­•भूजोलन­सराजाम­गरी­•नित्य
7पुजा­•गर्नु­गरी­•भगवन्त­वाडाका­हात­राष्यऊ­मुरि­पचास्‌­षेत­गुठीजनका­हात्‌­राषी­
8चैत्र­⟪अ⟫ष्टमिको­दिन­रांगो­१­वोक्या­१­भेट­दक्षिणा­दिपदानके­रुपैञा­१­आश्विनि­दसैके­रां
9गो­१­वोक्या­१­भेट­दक्षिणा­दिपदान­•पंचोपचार•पुजा­सामग्रि­⟪ स्ही⟫हिसमेत­पूजा­गर्नु­
10गरिदिञौँ­येति­पुजामहां­जसले­घटाउला­•पंचमाहापातक­लागला­•पुजा­वनाई­गर्नु­
11नैवैड्य­जस्को­•दस्तुर­ज्मा­हो­सो­सो­वाडी­षानु­गरी­•लेषिदिञौं­ईति­सम्वत्‌­१८४१­साल्‌­
12माघ­वदि­६­रोज­७­मुकाम्‌­•कांतिपुर­राजधानी­शुभ्ंम्‌­¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯ ¯¯¯

Translation

[1r]

[In the left margin:]

Signature [of the attestator]:

The one who attested that the copy is true to the original: Karuṇānaṃda Gobhāju, ...khaṃ Bāhāl1

[Invocatio:]

May Śrī Durgā help!

[Space above the main text:]

Śrī Baḍā Mahārājā2 – 1

Śrī Bhagavati – 2

[Addition above the main text:]

193

[Main text:]

Hail! A written letter of Śrī KaparadāraKālidāsa Khaḍkā

Āge: 100—[in words] one hundred—murīs of irrigated land (kheta) at Palāṃcoka's Rānipokhari were dedicated to [Śrī Bhagavati]4 by [Śrī Baḍā Mahārājā]5 in order to [provide] akṣatā for daily worship. For two to three years akṣeta was indeed produced and offered. Later the trust (guṭha) [for managing the Dasaĩ rituals] came into being (i.e. started operating) without its being announced (lit. "making petition") to His Majesty's Government (sarkāra). Therefore the whole field continued mainly to [produce] achetā [for daily worship]. But because [the original land grant] states: "Also operate the guṭha," we put fifty muris of the hundred murīs of kheta at Rānīpokhari under the charge of Bhagavanta Bāḍā for performing the daily worship (nityapūjā)—for preparing acheta and cooked rice6 . We have issued [another order saying:] "Put fifty muris under [the charge of] the guṭhī personnel and perform worship on the day of caitrāṣṭamī [with] 1 he-buffalo, 1 he-goat, 1 rupee for a gift of lamps (dīpadāna), bheṭa and dakṣiṇā; during the Dasaĩ in Āśvina [with] 1 he-buffalo, 1 he-goat, bheṭa, dakṣiṇā, a gift of lamps, [and] material for the worship with five offerings (pañcopacārapūjā). He who makes reductions to these pūjās will be tainted with [sin equal to that resulting from] the five grave sins (pañcamahāpātaka). Make [preparations for] and perform the worship. We have written down [the rule] that he whose whose customary obligation (dastura) it is [to produce?] food offerings (naivaiḍya for naivedya) shall enjoy the profit/homestead (bāḍī) [connected with it]. 7

Saturday, the 6th of the dark lunar fortnight of the month of Māgha in the [Vikrama] era year 1841 (1785 CE).8 Station: Kāṃtipura, the capital. Auspiciousness.


Commentary

The document is part of a batch of copies microfilmed from K_0579_0055 to K_0580_0004.9 All of them concern rituals and priestly rights at the temple of Śrī Bhagavatī of Palāñcoka and landed properties dedicated to their support. They all carry the archival numbers Ta. no. 1339 and Gu. Ba. no. 12 and feature running numbers between 1 and 41, the present document being no. 19 (see note above). The copies were probably made in connection with a quarrel in VS 1975 when Karuṇānanda Gubhāju issued a complaint against other priests, among them one Ṣaḍānanda, for misappropriating property belonging to the deity (K_0579_0055). The veracity of the copies of this and most of the other documents in the batch was certified by Karuṇānanda, and a few of them by Ṣaḍānanda. In his petition, Karuṇānanda quotes the present document and also states that the 100 murīs at Rānīpokharī were originally dedicated by Pṛthvīnārāyaṇa Śāha (śrī pṛthvīnārāṃ sāhāvāt rānīpokharī ṣet murī 100 kā vālīle śrī bhagavatīkana nityepujā gardā achetā ra bhujolaṃ bhoga lagāūnu). In K_0580_0002, too, Pṛthvīnārāyaṇa is referred to as the donor of the field.

Related documents include another letter, dated VS 1840 (1783 CE), from Kaparadāra Kālidāsa Khaḍkā authorizing Bhagavanta Bāḍā10 to perform the worship of Śrī Bhagavatī (K_0579_0062). In a follow-up letter from VS 1844 DevānaAbhimāna Siṃha [Basnyāt] writes to local officials (copies preserved as K_0579_0067 and K_0579_0064) reinforcing the arrangement formulated in the present document, which he refers to as a missive (daskhata) of the kaparadāra (kapardārako dasaṣata, K_0579_0064). Another document from the same year sent by Devāna Nāhāra Siṃha [Basnyāt], Abhimāna Siṃha [Basnyāt], Dhaukala Siṃha [Basnyāt] and Jahara Siṃha [Basnyāt] even quotes the present document verbatim (K_0579_0072).

The document concerns landed property endowed to fund rituals at the famous Bhagavatī temple of Palāñcoka. The kaparadāra fixes the rule that the field originally endowed by the king is to be divided in equal shares between the priest (Bhagavanta Bāḍā) and unnamed personnel, the latter charged with operating the guṭhi. From the list of items to be provided, it is clear that Bhagavanta Bāḍā would be responsible for the nityapūjā, while the guṭhi was to take care of worship during both Dasaĩ festivals.11 The establishment of such a guṭhi also must have been part of the original endowment, but apparently it only started operating some years later and without officially announcing the implementation of the royal deed to the government. In this situation the present order clarifies the scheme under which the produce of the land originally endowed would have to be shared between these two parties involved, effectively constituting a curtailment of rights over the land by Bhagavanta Bāḍā, who had used the produce of the land alone so far.


Notes

1. Due to a folding in the paper the first part of the place name describing the residence of the signatory cannot be read. In the petition filed in connection with which the present copy was probably made, Karunānaṃda Gubhāju describes his residence as the "city of Kathmandu, Makhaṃ Tol, Makhaṃ Bāhāl" (sahara kāṭhamāḍau maṣaṃ tol maṣaṃ vāhāl) so that there is good reason to assume that the deficient reading can be supplemented to read Makhaṃ Tol, Makhaṃ Bāhāl. []

2. The date of issue of the document lies during the reign of King Raṇabahādura, but according to related documents (see Commentary) the field in original endowment had been made by King Pṛthvīnārāyaṇa, that is, much earlier than the two to three years specified in the present document as the time during which the previous arrangements for the field had been in force. So the conflict had probably been smouldering for some years. []

3. This number, added by a later hand, refers to the place of the document in a batch of 24 document copies related to the same temple microfilmed from K_0579_0055 (numbered 1) to K_0580_0004 (numbered 41); see Commentary. []

4. Inserted from the space numbered 2 above. []

5. Inserted from the space numbered 1 above. []

6. As bhūjolana does not make sense, I here assume that the original read bhūjokana, bhūjākana or something similar.This assumption might be incorrect, though, as in a previous document pertaining to the field that field’s purpose is cited as achetā ra bhujolaṃ bhoga lagāūnu (K_0579_0055, see Commentary below). []

7. The meaning of the sentence is unclear. It hinges on the interpretation of the words dastura and vāḍī. Dastura can denote a customary fee, but more generally a custom, tradition or rule. The word bāḍī could be interpreted either as "increase, interest on money ... profit" (Turner 1931: s.v. bāḍi) or as "homestead" (gharaghaḍerī, Parājulī et al. VS 2067: s.v. bāḍī). []

8. The said lunar day (tithi) was a Monday in the year VS 1841 (corresponding to 31 January 1785). In VS 1842, however, it was a Saturday (corresponding to 21 January 1786). So there is probably a copying mistake involved here, either in the year or in the number of the tithi or of the weekday. As no other copy of the document has been traced yet, the matter cannot be decided for now. In any event the document must have been issued before Sunday, the 15th of the bright lunar fortnight of Kārttika in VS 1844 (25 November 1787), as on this day a follow-up document was issued that quotes it verbatim (K_0579_0072). []

9. Another batch of documents related to the same temple was microfilmed from K_0579_0046 to K_0579_0051. These, however, have different archival numbers. []

10. The first document in the batch that mentions Bhagavanta Bāḍā as being in charge of the temple is dated VS 1832 (1776) and mentions the offering of two slaves (kamārī) to work at the temple (K_0579_0063). In K_0579_0055 he is referred to as having passed away in VS 1844. []

11. For more details on persons involved in this Dasaĩ guṭhi and material to be provided under its oversight, see K_0580_0002. []