Edited and
translated by Simon Cubelic
in collaboration with
Rajan Khatiwoda
Created: 2017-03-29;
Last modified: 2018-06-20
For the metadata of the document, click here
[1r]
1श्रीदुर्गाज्यू\1१८८1⟪३९⟫1श्रीगुरुपंण्डितराज[1v]
1मार्फत्फत्त्यजङ्गसाहमाफतश्रीविष्णुपंडितराजमार्फत्करवीरपांडे[1r]
Venerable Durgājyū
1881
392
Venerable Guru Paṇḍitarāja, the Venerable Raṅganātha Paṇḍitajyū3
Hail! [This is] a missive (rukkā) of the supreme king of the great kings.
Āge: To the ijārādāras, tahasīladāras, rakamīs, amālīs, dvāryās, tharīs, mijhāras, gauruṅs and local notables (bhalā mānisa) and so forth from all places east of the Mahākālī and west of the Mecī [River] and of the entire foothills (pāhāḍa). Whatever you have given to the mukhtiyāra and the bhāradāras from very early times on as honorary gifts (najaranajarānā), customary fees (daidastura) [or] levies (sarsalāmī), [whether] in cash (nagada) or kind (jinīs), deposit from now on—at that same [rate], without decreasing them [even] a little [but leaving them] as they were—through [Venerable Guru Paṇḍitarāja, the Venerable Raṅganātha Paṇḍitajyū]. Whoever through falsehood or concealment does not deposit the levies, honorary gifts or customary fees in accordance with what has been given to former mukhtiyāras and bhāradāras will be [considered] a rebel (apsariyā).
Thursday, the 10th of the bright fortnight of Mārga of the [Vikrama] era year 1894 (1837 CE). Auspiciousness.
Through (mārphat) Phattyajaṅga Śāha, through Venerable Viṣṇu Paṇḍitarāja, through Karavīra Pā̃ḍe, through Tārānātha Arjyāl, through Raṇajora Thāpā, through Dalbhañjana Pā̃ḍe, through Kulamāna Siṃha Basnyāt.
This missive reflects changes in the mukhtiyāra-ship that took place in 1837. After the fall of Bhīmasena Thāpā in July 1837—a result of him being accused of poisoning Prince Devendra—he was first replaced by Raṇajaṅga Pā̃ḍe, and in December 1837 by the royal preceptor, Raṅganātha Pauḍyāla (Stiller 1976: 275–276; Whelpton 1991: 52–55). However, only a couple of months later, Raṅganātha had to resign from his post, one reason being his unpopularity among the troops following reforms to the military including proposed cuts in emoluments (cf. Stiller 1976: 277).