Edited and
translated by Julia Shrestha
Created: 2024-08-05;
Last modified: 2024-12-05
For the metadata of the document, click here
[1r]
1141स्वस्तिश्रीमन्माहाराजधिराजकस्यरूक्का[1r-part2]
1राईनतुल्याउनुठेकथितिमाषिचोलोनपारनु१०वर्षसम्मनवढाउनु[1r]
141
Hail! [This is] a rukkā from the venerable king of great kings.2
Age: [Concerning the areas] east of the Arun and west of the Mechi [rivers], [to all the] Yākhās, Lohorungs, Āṭhpahariyās throughout the territory (ambala) of Chainpur, Limbuvān, Pāñca Khapana [and] Daśa Majhiyā, [and to the] govās and Bhoṭanās [of] Sohra Khālsā [and] Bhaṃphu3 etc.4
We have received your petition, submitted through KājiNahāra Siṃ Thāpā to us, which states:
“An inspection [party] came to our villages, houses and fields. After the [initial] inspection was completed, annual inspections were carried out by the amāli[s] of the regiment (palṭana) and the jilladāras of the regular army (kampu), who have inspected the fields and houses every year.5 Our brothers (bhāīviradāra)6 , having split off from us, have become new subbās, rāīs [and] pagaris, and have been causing many disputes over the land. From now on, our brothers who have become such [functionaries] will also go to Tibet (Bhoṭa) and India (text: Mogalān for Mugalān). [We request] that no new subbās, rāīs or pagaris be appointed and that no household census (ghardara) be conducted or inspections of our kipaṭ fields carried out within the next 10 years. According to the thiti bandeja that Your Majesty has established, [a subbā’s] tenant (ḍhākryā) is to be inspected [only] every three years; he will pay [the accrued rent] in equal instalments."
We have issued the following decree settling 7 [this matter] for 10 years:8
From the 1st of the dark fortnight of Vaiśāka in the year [VS 18]91, the amāli and jillādāra of the regular army and regiment are not to inspect your villages, houses or your kipaṭ fields; the kipaṭ fields you have cleared and brought under cultivation by your own hoe; [or] lands that have been granted for cultivation to you according to the prior thitimohara—they are not to conduct an inspection of the fields or take more household censuses. Regardless of how many brothers are splitting off, no new subbās [or] rāīs are to be appointed for 10 years. No disputes are to [be allowed] to arise under the ṭhekathiti. [Rates] are not to be increased for 10 years. You, too, remain in compliance [with] subbās, new or old, from the years 84 to 91, and with the ṭhekaṭhiti written in the year 84 [and updated] to the year 91, and submit the required sums.9 Do not cause disputes regarding the rates on those lands and houses for which land titles (purjā) have been recorded in the ledger during the village inspection. Do not request exemptions on raikara lands. Do not withhold but [rather] submit [the rent] on standing crops (bālī) in your ambala that accrues every three years, on land cultivated by Limbu tenants etc. and on fields newly cultivated by settler tenants.10 After reaching 10 years, we may consider (tajavija gari vaksaulā) scaling back or enlarging the household censuses.11 Being mindful of your duties, continue overseeing affairs, establishing settlements and making the land prosperous in accordance with the thiti bandeja.
Tuesday, the 14th of the bright fortnight of Vaiśākha in the [Vikrama era] year 1891 (1834 CE).
Backside: through (marphāta) Phatpejaṃ Sāhā
through Puskara Sāhā
through Bhimsena Thāpā
through Dalabhaṃjana Pāḍe
through Kulamānasiṃ Vasnyāta
through Raṇajora Thāpā
through Raśvota Sāhā
This copy of a royal executive order shows that tax inspections in the Limbuvān (Pallo Kirāta) region had been meeting with local resistance during the preceding period. The ṭhekathiti system, introduced in 1820 as an agreement between the Limbu headmen and the Nepalese government, required every household to pay a tax, which necessitated a comprehensive census of households. It also made the Limbu headmen, the subbās, the tax collectors (tālukadāra) (Sagant 2008: 132), to whom the other officers (rāī, pagari) were subordinate (ibid.: 139). As the text indicates, following the initial census conducted between 1820 and 1827 the Limbus and other Kiranti communities resisted annual inspections, which usually resulted in higher tax burdens for them (Regmi 1965: 107–109). This resistance apparently was so strong that the state compromised by reducing the frequency of inspections to every ten years (ibid.).
Another point of dispute was the increasing number of officers, which must be understood in the context of the subbā's role as the custodian and manager of the communal landholdings. The titles were hereditary, though new clan segments and subbās emerged amid factional conflicts over territory as well as titles. As the subbā could earn commissions on land transactions mediated by him within his ambala, he could exploit this for his own profit by selling areas of cultivable land. In doing so, the local elites contributed to Limbus being dispossessed of their ancestral lands (see Sagant 2008: 125–6; for an analysis of the disintegration of kipaṭ lands and the fragmentation of lineages and titles, see Chapter 3: "Land and Kin Groups" in Caplan 2000).
The communal landholdings of Limbus gradually eroded over time. Under the Gorkha Śāhas, the state largely recognized the indigenous tenure system as part of an agreement with the Limbus in exchange for their political loyalty. However, the land surveys conducted by Gorkha officials in Pallo Kirāta mentioned in the present document reflect a shift toward increased state control. The weakening of indigenous land rights reached its peak under the Rāṇā regime, during which many Limbus were economically forced to mortgage land. Still, in comparison to other indigenous communities, they tenaciously clung to their traditional land rights until recent times (Regmi 1965: 91; see also the newspaper article Mabohang 2022).