Edited and
translated by Rajendra Shakya
in collaboration with
Rabi Acharya
Created: 2020-04-24;
Last modified: 2020-09-10
For the metadata of the document, click here
[1r]
1श्रीपश्चिमतर्फकाकम्यां[1r]
Śrī Western Commanding General – 1
Hail! A letter from Commander-in-chief General Jīta Jaṅga Bahādura Rāṇā, a prince born of a prince
Āge: To Chiduṃdu, the mukhiyā of Prok village [within] the Kuṭāṃbhoṭ sector of the Aṭhāra Saya Kholā [region]
In accordance with the supplication submitted to us by JimmāvālaChīma Dorjye Khunu regarding Prok village [within] the Kuṭāṃbhoṭ sector of the Aṭhāra Saya Kholā [region], which has been registered as our khānagī under the western commanding generalship, stating: “May a lease contract be formalized in favour of Mukhiyā Chiduṃdu by replacing the previous mukhiyā, Pāsā[ṅ]Chiriṃ, since the latter has passed away,” we have formalized an annual lokābhāra lease contract at the usual rate for as long as [this] khānagī remains with us, with the following details:
“Except for rāja aṅka1 , kalyānadhana, dharmādhikārapañcakhata and arrearages (rahatā bahatā, uḍaṃtā, gaḍaṃtā)2 , jhārā levies on rakamī households, unregistered customary taxes and levies (rakamakalama), and [fines for] faults (cukṣata)3 [committed by holders of] pagarī [contracts], [all other liabilities]—the scheduled sermā, syāphala4 and sirto [revenue], [and also] registered customary taxes and levies, and daṇḍakuṇḍa, maryo aputālī, cākacakui [levies] that are imposed in accordance with the Ain, [all of which] have been imposed on the 1 village of Prok on a yearly basis, shall [now] receive a complete exemption for a period of one year [beginning] (istaka) from the 1st of the dark fortnight of the month of Āśvina in the year VS 1941 (1884 CE) to the 15th of the bright fortnight of the month of Bhādra in the year [VS 19]42 (1885 CE). You shall [therefore] submit a total sum of 301 mohararupaiyā̃s 2 sukās, which includes the scheduled [tax] of 176 mohararupaiyā̃s and an asmānī [levy] of 125 mohararupaiyā̃s 2 sukās, along with 5 pāthīs 5 mānās of salt for [a period of] 1 year.
“Keep the ryots well disposed by overseeing affairs, founding settlements and making crops flourish (ābāda guljāra garī), and collect revenue as listed and managed previously, and submit [the total amount] which you have agreed to pay, in cash and kind, for each year in a single instalment in the month of Māgha through the jimmāvāla, delivering it to our Tahasila Aḍḍā and obtaining a receipt.
“In the case where a jimmāvāla mishandles money matters, [and then] dies or runs away, then you, the mukhiyā and the ryots, shall have to pay from your household property. When [there are orders] in writing in [the form of] a sanada or purjī for particular market products [or other] items, make the purchase at the current rate in the village, as was done previously, and deposit them. When dispatching such items, do so from the government offices (aḍḍā) that were previously used. Do not sell elsewhere the wax and musk available in your village. Deposit all available [wax and musk] here [into our treasury] and get the reduction in [the amount due according to] the lease contract.
“Besides [the commitments under] the contract, use [the revenue], without any reduction [to the previous outlays,] for whatever general expenses there are for [observing] the Dasaĩ festival or for the worship of -3- [the glorious gods/divinities]5 . You shall not receive even a single dāma remitted on the total amount you have agreed to pay in the case where -4- [some act of the glorious gods/divinities has befallen you]6 or you fail to collect [what is owed] on [lokābhāra] land. In the case where there is a surplus [in the collection of revenue mentioned in] the lokābhāra contract, proportionally distribute it to ryots. If there is a loss, proportionally collect from the ryots [the shortfall] and submit [it to our treasury].
“Follow the rules set by the Ain when settling lawsuits between subjects. Do not cause injury and oppression. If you do not follow what has been written [in the Ain] by inflating or reducing [figures], taking bribes or [embezzling] sarsalāmī [payments], and imposing and collecting new levies, overstepping your authority, causing injury and oppression, and so making subjects suffer, and if anyone comes to complain and proves [such wrongdoing], then you shall pay in accordance with the Ain.
“If [anyone among you] is unable to deposit the instalment that is to be paid as a [single] annual instalment in the month of Māgha, [or] if [anyone among you] is found to have misappropriated wax and musk instead of depositing them into our treasury or sold elsewhere, then you shall be punished in accordance with the Ain: double the amount of cash due and with [due] items assessed at the rate in Asana7 shall be exacted from your household property, and the lokābhāra contract shall then be annulled. You shall not have the right to file a complaint, claiming: “It is a lokābhāra [contract].” Deposit the asmānī revenue gained from [fines for] faults (cukṣat) [committed by holders of] pagarī [contracts] in addition to the contractual amount and obtain a receipt.”
Tend the land with content (khātirajāmā), considering [it] as a raitānalokābhāra lease contract.
Monday, the 2nd of the bright fortnight of Phālguṇa in the [Vikrama] era year 1941 [1885 CE]. Auspiciousness.
Jīta Jaṅga, the third son of Jaṅga Bahādura, issued this document as the commander-in-chief general to formalize a lokābhāra lease contract for his khānagī, which he held in the capacity of western commanding general. This suggests that he had recently been promoted to the post of commander-in-chief general and the annual pajanī function was yet to take place. Another document, Tsum_0001_0012, dating from 1888 CE, is an example of a similar situation: Raṇa Śamśera was being paid under a khānagī held in the capacity of western commanding general while having already been promoted to commander-in-chief general, and indeed had already passed away, when the payment was made for that khānagī.
Jīta Jaṅga’s tenure as commander-in-chief general ended with a sudden decision to resign from his post and go into self-imposed exile to India. He left Kathmandu for India around May 1885 on the pretext of getting treatment for a hearing impairment and sent in his resignation once there. The real reason behind his departure was apparently his suspicion that some untoward incidents might take place due to rising political tensions in the capital (Rāṇā 2059 VS: 239-240). There is another, more personal reason, though: Prime Minister Raṇa Uddīpa Siṃha (Rāṇā) had transferred some of Jīta Jaṅga’s power to the sons of Dhīra Śamśera, leaving him distraught. Despite his resignation, his name continued to appear on official documents as the occupant of that position, although Raṇavīra Jaṅga Rāṇā officiated on his behalf (Sever 2014: 198). The date of issuance of this document, mid-February 1885, was just months before Jīta Jaṅga went into exile. He was still being mentioned as the commander-in-chief general at the time of the assassination of Raṇa Uddīpa Siṃha on 22 November 1885 (Sever 2014: 470).